![]() |
A Colorado non-profit organization advocating for animals in the political arena |
| 2003 Colorado State Legislature Voting Record | |||||
| State Senate District 4 - Ken Chlouber (R) | |||||
| Legislator's Votes on High-Priority Animal-Related Legislation | |||||
| Bill or Resolution # | Description | Committee Vote(s) | Floor Vote(s) | PVA Position(s) | Final outcome of legislation |
| SB03-065 Sponsor | This bill would allow peace officers to impound animals who are the subjects of suspected cruelty. The bill would also strengthen the definition of cruelty to animals to include housing an animal in a manner that results in chronic or repeated serious physical harm. | Yes1 | Yes | Yes | Signed into law |
| SB03-107 Sponsor | This bill would increase the number of days that greyhound racing facilities may simulcast greyhound races from other facilities. This would be a financial benefit to the greyhound racing industry. | Yes | No | Became law; the Governor did not sign the bill into law and he did not veto it | |
| SB03-114 | This bill would create fines for the offense of knowingly luring a wild bear to food or edible waste. A warning would be given the first time a person violates this law. After that, a first offense would be a $100 fine, a second offense would be a $500 fine, and a third or subsequent offense would be a $1000 fine. | No1; No2 | No | Yes | Signed into law |
| SB03-123 | This bill would prohibit the issuance of a license for or the expansion of the acreage of alternative livestock farms or commercial wildlife parks that hold alternative livestock. Alternative livestock are animals such as elk that are kept on these farms primarily for trophy hunting - a practice often referred to as "canned hunting." The bill would also require these farms and parks to separate alternative livestock from other wildlife with a double fence and it would prohibit any farm or park from transferring alternative livestock without certification that the farm is free of tuberculosis and brucellosis. | No1 (**Please see note below) | Yes | The bill's sponsor requested that it be killed; killed by the Senate Agriculture, Natural Resources & Energy Committee | |
| SCR03-002 | This resolution would submit to the voters of Colorado the question of whether ballot issues dealing with the hunting of wildlife should have to pass with 2/3 of the vote, instead of the simple majority that is required to pass all other ballot issues. | Yes1 | No | Passed by the Senate Agriculture, Natural Resources & Energy Committee; never voted on by the full Senate | |
| HB03-1097 | This bill would tighten hunting regulations and the fines imposed for violations. It specifically prohibits such activities as shooting animals from vehicles; using electronic devices to track and kill animals from aircraft; using night vision, enhanced light-gathering optics, or thermal imaging devices as hunting aids; and hunting animals during the night. The bill would also strengthen penalties for hunters who violate hunting regulations. | Yes1 | Yes | Yes | Signed into law |
| HJR03-1022 | This resolution outlines the problems of dog and cat overpopulation and declares February 25 as Spay and Neuter Your Pet Day in Colorado. | Yes | Yes | Adopted by the Senate and the House | |
| SCORES | 40% | 60% | |||
| Legislator's Overall Score on Animal-Related Legislation ~ 50% | |||||
| Legislator's Votes on High-Priority Petition-Related Legislation | |||||
| Bill or Resolution # | Description | Committee Vote(s) | Floor Vote(s) | PVA Position(s) | Final outcome of legislation |
| SCR03-002 | This resolution would submit to the voters of Colorado the question of whether ballot issues dealing with the hunting of wildlife should have to pass with 2/3 of the vote, instead of the simple majority that is required to pass all other ballot issues. | Yes1 | No | Passed by the Senate Agriculture, Natural Resources & Energy Committee; never voted on by the full Senate | |
| SCORES | 0% | N/A | |||
| Legislator's Overall Score on Petition-Related Legislation ~ 0% | |||||
| Legislator's Overall Score on PVA's Top-Priority Legislation ~ 45% | |||||
| 1. Senate Committee on Agriculture, Natural Resources & Energy | |||||
| 2. Senate Committee on Appropriations | |||||
| ** PVA chose to include the vote on SB03-123 because of the importance of the bill, but we did not count it in the Senator's score because the sponsor requested that the bill be killed. | |||||
| Legislator's PVA History | |||||
| Legislator's overall voting record score in previous years tracked: | |||||
| 1999 ~ 0% | 2000 ~ 67% | 2001 ~ 80% | 2002 ~ 70% | |||||
| Legislator's scores on 2000 and 2002 candidate questionnaires: | |||||
| 2000 ~ Did not respond | 2002 ~ Not up for re-election | |||||